Showing posts with label NHS. Show all posts
Showing posts with label NHS. Show all posts

Friday, 24 May 2013

The NHS - an accident waiting the happen

The current state of our hospitals and specifically Accident and Emergency (A&E)  is a car crash waiting to happen.  The problems in A&E are blamed on the number of visits, which have risen by 50% in England in a decade and recently waiting times and other performance metrics have been on the wane.  GP consultations are up by a third since the mid 1990s and the number of routine operations carried out by hospitals, such as knee and hip replacements, has still jumped by 60% since the mid 1990s.  The case for the defense as promulgated by the NHS’s management is – “we are having to do more with less or the same resources”.


The problems started with Tony Blair’s reorganization in 2004, which decided that GPs could no longer cope with out of hours work, this forced many non-critical cases to report to Accident and Emergency units in their local hospitals.  The College of Emergency Medicine estimates up to a third of patients turning up at A&E could be treated by a nurse or GP without going to Hospital. The BMA constantly tell us how hard there GP members work and that they are good value for money but the reality is very different.  The number of GPs per head of population has in fact remained pretty constant over the last 10 years.  The has been a slight increase in patient visits per year but in many cases GPs are paid to take on specific treatments and this probably drives consultation numbers.  More importantly, whilst the GP contribution to the NHS has been in decline for years their take of the financial pie has grown exponentially.  This is the  main problem in the NHS is the disproportionate funding that is soaked up by our GPs, who add little value and are now grossly over paid.  The sad truth is that (very) General Practice is becoming an anachronism, the growth of science and knowledge is forcing our best consultants to specialise:  once we had ENT consultants now they specialise in ear, nose or throat – what chance has a GP in this increasingly technical and specialist world?  
The Blair contract had the effect in its first two years of reducing productivity by an average of 2.5 per cent per year. In 2006 GPs worked on average seven hours less per week than in 1992, partly because of the removal of the responsibility for out of hours care. In 2005-06 the annual average pay of a GP partner was £113,614, an increase of 58 per cent on the pre-Blair deal of 2002-03. Since then there has been some slow down in wage inflation but this is about to change.  In addition to ballooning salaries, family doctors will be paid a further £26,000 to commission NHS services. Last year 210 GPs earned more than £250,000 and a Daily Mail investigation (needs to be treated with caution) has revealed that some GPS are earning up to £380,000 a year.   Out of the 250,000 doctors registered and working in the UK some 140,000 are GPs costing the NHS some £17bn a year (in salaries alone) or over 17% of all money spent on healthcare – an awful waste of money when the modern day GP is little more than a freight forwarding business shuffling patients around the system!
What the NHS needs is:

  1. Fewer and less expensive GPs
  2. More out of hours care provided by the district nurse equivalent
  3. A more regional structure NHS England is just too big to be managed effectively
  4. Competition for various treatments (heart, cancer, hip replacements, etc)
  5. Tax breaks for private health care that needs to soak up more demand
  6. Patient fines for self inflicted damage - drink , drug and  smoking related injuries / ill health

Wednesday, 6 February 2013

Do they care?

We are all getting old so this stuff matters a lot!

The truly dreadful report on the quality of care at Mid Stafford NHS Trust, which was published today, is an important reminder that 'our' National Health Service is in a terrible mess. The main headline was that there were between 400 and 1,200 more deaths than would have been expected, due to poor care.



Inquiry chairman, Robert Francis QC, said the failings went right to the top of the health service.  He made 290 recommendations, saying "fundamental change" was needed to prevent the public losing confidence.  Responding in the House of Commons, Prime Minister David Cameron apologised to the families of patients.  He said he was "truly sorry" for what happened at Stafford Hospital, which was "not just wrong, it was truly dreadful" and the government needed to "purge" a culture of complacency.  Actually he doesn't believe any of that guff as he is enthralled with 'our NHS' and like his 'Heir' (Tony Blair) he is in no position to deal with the underlining issue, which is the NHS is too big to save.


After the countless re-organisations over the last 70 years and specifically since 2001 the patient (NHS) is in a critical condition.  Like an obese man who hasn't the will power change his diet the NHS lumbers on towards a cardiac arrest


Some of the re-organisations over the last 10 years


We need to answer the question – is it possible to run an organisation of the scale and complexity of the NHS and consistently get improving outcomes?

Here are some statistics

  • NHS net expenditure was £106 bn in 2012/13
  • That’s  £1,979 per capita
  • The organisation consists of 2,312 hospitals and 10,500 GP practices in the UK
  • There are 1.35 million staff employed by the NHS  - 143,836 doctors, 370,327 qualified nursing staff, and 38,214 managers.  (What do the rest do?)
  • The NHS deals with over 1 million patients 
  • Currently the NHS has over £18bn of outstanding clinical negligence claims for poor care outstanding 
To a simple management consultant it just looks too cumbersome.  To improve care (which is generally pretty poor) and to reduce costs we need to do the unthinkable - break it up and get more market dynamics into this monopoly of mediocrity.

How do we stack up?

Okay actually but my guess is that the other health services are rubbish as well!!


Column1 UK France  Spain Germany
Total population 62,036,000 62,787,000 46,077,000 82,302,000
Gross national income per capita (PPP international $) 35,840 34,750 31,800 38,100
Life expectancy at birth m/f (years) 78/82 78/85 78/85 78/83
Probability of dying under five (per 1 000 live births) 5 4 4 4
Probability of dying between 15 and 60 years m/f (per 1 000 pop) 95/58 117/54 94/43 99/53
Total expenditure on health per capita (Intl $, 2010) 3,480 4,021 3,027 4,332
Total expenditure on health as % of GDP (2010) 9.6 11.9 9.5 11.6

Sunday, 27 January 2013

Our very own NHS

It has become politically incorrect to have any negative thoughts about the NHS.  Indeed the present Government is so scared of this institution and the fond place it has in our nation's heart that they have protected it from any spending cuts (The NHS also had a starring role in the Olympics open ceremony). 

Today's story in the Telegraph is yet another example of how poorly the National Health Service is run; specifically the low standards of clinical care that are now the norm.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/health/healthnews/9827116/Mid-Staffs-scandal-dummy-taped-to-babys-mouth.html

To understand the financial cost of all this one needs to navigate to the NHS Litigation Authority website (there is an entire business set up to manage the results of this poor care) http://www.nhsla.com/Pages/Home.aspx


You have to be diligent to find the statistics but buried deep in the reports on the NHSLA website there were clinical litigation claims outstanding against the NHS that amount to over £18 BILLION.

http://www.nhsla.com/CurrentActivity/Documents/NHSLA%20Factsheet%202%20-%20financial%20information%202011-12.doc

From their website:

http://www.nhsla.com/CurrentActivity/Documents/NHSLA%20Factsheet%202%20-%20financial%20information%202011-12.doc


Outstanding liabilities

As at 31 March 2012, the NHSLA estimates that it has potential liabilities of £18.9 billion, of which £18.6 billion relate to clinical negligence claims

Monday, 14 January 2013

Your good health! Or not?


Of all the fatuous surveys here's one to rank alongside the  survey of popular dictators between conducted in 1950 which went:

From this list of current and past dictators, which leader would you trust the most : Adolph Hitler, Benito Mussolini, Moa Tse Tung, Joesph Stalin, or The Emperor Hirohito.  And the clear winner was Moa (he had the biggest fan base)!

In the same vain some numpty has run a survey of 'much loved' British institutions and has concocted a result that has our national health service (NHS) as the clear winner.


Let us remember that this is the same NHS that currently has some £17bn of clinical negligence claims outstanding and where mistakes and incidents of poor care are common - you should read this article in the telegraph!

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/health/healthnews/9800807/Dementia-sufferers-abandoned-says-Jeremy-Hunt.html

Its also interesting that whilst scraping the bottom of the barrel the BBC made a spirited entrance at number five.  I think I know why the NHS won - about 1 in 3 people work for this poorly run organisation!  Over the last 10-15 year it has been impossible (politically incorrect) to criticise the NHS and this oversight is in part responsible for the dramatic decline in standards of care.
 
THE BOTTOM OF THE BARREL

Subscribe Now: Feed Icon